Home / Cameroon

Port Dispute: BitJoka’s Trading and Mvondo-CAM Plus Face Legal Battle Over Heavy Equipment

A commercial dispute involving BitJoka’s Trading and Mvondo-CAM Plus has emerged over heavy equipment reportedly held at the Port of Douala. While social-media reports allege fraud and breach of trust, available reporting confirms a legal and commercial dispute but does not independently establish those allegations.

By Angelle Nforba

Port Dispute: BitJoka’s Trading and Mvondo-CAM Plus Face Legal Battle Over Heavy Equipment

Commercial Dispute Over Heavy Equipment Reaches Court

A commercial dispute involving BitJoka’s Trading and Mvondo-CAM Plus, headed by Rodrigue Mvondo, has drawn attention in Douala following disagreements over heavy equipment reportedly held at the Port of Douala.

Reports circulating on social media allege that Mvondo obtained large sums of money after claiming he had connections that could facilitate the clearance and removal of heavy-duty equipment from the port. The same reports accuse him of failing to deliver on the arrangement.

However, these specific allegations have not been independently established.

A report published by Journal L’Immigrant on September 23, 2026, confirms that a dispute exists between BitJoka’s Trading and Mvondo-CAM Plus concerning a shipment of heavy equipment, including cranes, at the Port of Douala. The report also raises questions concerning the documentation and ownership of the cargo.

According to the publication, a bill of lading dated July 9, 2025, identifies SOCARCAM as the consignee, while Rodrigue Mvondo is listed as the notified party. The report says BitJoka’s Trading is not named on that document, a point that could become relevant to the legal dispute over the shipment.

The case therefore appears to involve more than allegations of unpaid or misappropriated funds. Questions surrounding the ownership, representation and clearance of the equipment could also form part of the dispute.

Social-media claims describing the matter as a straightforward case of “fraud and abuse of confidence” should consequently be treated with caution until court documents or statements from the parties and competent authorities establish the precise charges and circumstances.

The matter is now expected to be clarified through the appropriate legal channels, where the parties can present their evidence and the court can determine the applicable facts and responsibilities.

Legit Cameroon will continue to follow the case and update readers as verified information becomes available.